best nuanced and accurate view of the harvard civil right violations (title vi, title vii, title ix) resulting from decades shift of focus from object truth seeking to marxist ideology activism. it even includes potential free speech concerns of the trump administration. ironically, she is only 24 and probably the youngest person i have seen to review this.
Hi everyone, I haven't been active in Solid Ground for a while, but I am still alive and kicking! I now work as personal assistant to a mind-bendingly weird and diva-esque artist-lip-syncher-performer named Fiona Blueberry. She is blissfully clueless about politics and seems to be completely unaware of the culture wars. Working with her is a breath of fresh air. If you need a mood lift, I encourage you to watch this video we made together. Happy 4th, everyone! Wishing you fun/love/peace on this holiday. :) www.fionablueberry.com
Our very own @YayRain (after having imbibed some golden nectar), shares with us yet one more problem with CRT....
There are multiple threads from some things Chris posted recently, but this caught my eye
From Jonah Goldberg:
I get it. Thanks for the response. Just a few points:
1) I watched as many on the right went from demonizing Saul Alinsky to respecting, to outright envying and wanting to emulate him. Many of those people stopped being conservative or classically liberal in the process. Steve Bannon, Dinesh, etc.
2) Your argument feels very similar and I think poses similar risks. Adopting illiberal means to achieve liberal or even just "good" ends is not a remotely new idea. It is in fact one of the oldest ideas in politics. And it doesn't have a very good track record.
3) One reason for that is that illiberal means tend to become illiberal ends in the hearts of the people employing them.
4) This is a real danger from where I sit because an American conservatism that doesn't seek to conserve "classical liberalism" isn't meaningfully conservative anymore. American conservatism is about more than classical ...
