Shadow Work - the Prerequisite to Disclosure
@Raymond_Mikal recently posted two links to videos about UFO disclosure. One, a lengthy and at times repetitive edit of conversations between Gregg Braden and John Peterson (https://youtu.be/uTZKXuSB_oI). The other, an interview with Steven Greer on Redacted (https://youtu.be/vDdjHs8CddA). May I suggest pairing these two, and see if the following makes sense?
In the Braden/Peterson conversation, one of the points featured is that Peterson's team at Arlington Institute came up with 38 scenarios of disclosure, and only 2 or 3 do not result in civilization driving off a cliff.
In the interview with Greer, a significant detail is that the leadership at the center of secret black budget development of UFO tech deliberately screen for psycho-/sociopathic personalities to be admitted into the deeper ranks. He points out that most people find it impossibly difficult to attempt to contemplate the mindset of the truly evil.
The combination of these two points from the two interviews indicates to me that in order to break the disclosure barrier, there first must be a critical mass of individuals willing and able to cease projecting evil onto others with whom they disagree, and instead to look within with complete honesty to take ownership and responsibility for all that we harbor inside ourselves, even if it is not expressed.
To paraphrase Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, "The line between good and evil runs through the heart of every person."
Posts by @Raymond_Mikal:
Hi everyone, I haven't been active in Solid Ground for a while, but I am still alive and kicking! I now work as personal assistant to a mind-bendingly weird and diva-esque artist-lip-syncher-performer named Fiona Blueberry. She is blissfully clueless about politics and seems to be completely unaware of the culture wars. Working with her is a breath of fresh air. If you need a mood lift, I encourage you to watch this video we made together. Happy 4th, everyone! Wishing you fun/love/peace on this holiday. :) www.fionablueberry.com
Our very own @YayRain (after having imbibed some golden nectar), shares with us yet one more problem with CRT....
A tough take on "liberalism" (sorry for scare quotes; the labels mean so many different things, depending on perspective) in Unherd. I'm not familiar with the writer. His basic angle rings true, which is that, finally, "liberalism" itself may be revealed to be more utopian and idealistic than practical or pragmatic (akin to "communism," and the many attempts to use it as a governmental or societal framework). He uses the recent ousting of Assad in Syria and the government that's replaced him as a potential vision of "pragmatic" governance to come.
Long pull-quote:
"Broken, dejected, for the first time self-doubting, America’s liberal establishment has come to accept the extinction of its political order. Had they taken their project — or their right to eternal rule — as seriously as they claimed to, no doubt they would have chosen stronger candidates than Joe Biden and Kamala Harris: that they could not do so itself speaks of a certain exhaustion. Beyond the rhetoric, at least as messianic and ...
